There is a growing divide between the Web 2.0 world and professionals who write or perform for a living. Consumers think the world can support both — that people can stop paying for music, and artists will keep producing the same high-quality songs we’re used to enjoying. That we can read blogs until the cows come home, but still turn to CNN.com or The Boston Globe when we want our ‘real news.’
The truth is, we’re in a time of transition, and it’s very uncomfortable for many in traditional media. Newspapers, magazines and the music industry are all struggling to understand where they can fit into this new world and still have a business. Reporters expect a paycheck for their work, while “citizen journalists” expect nothing but readers (for now). Professional writers still need to be paid, while others who do so as a hobby (e.g., Wikipedia) find it a fun diversion (without all the messy research or fact-checking).
I suspect that this will work out in everyone’s favor eventually. Professionals who want to be paid for their work can be or are (at least in our small part of the world). It’s just a matter of understanding a business model that will work for you. Some newspapers are starting to “get it” and adjust their businesses appropriately. But there are no easy answers as people’s tastes and needs for news, information and entertainment are in a state of changing. Times of change are always scary, but I’m optimistic that years from now, we will have found a balance between the Web 2.0 world and the traditional world of publishing.
(2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ...You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
One Comment to
“The Growing Web 2.0 Divide”
One thing that we still often have to pay for is quality. Access to peer reviewed journals typically require subscriptions and access to Oxford University Press Online (for example) still requires a subscription.
The rate of amateur publishing is concerning to me insofar as people don’t think critically about the information they are presented with, don’t check the sources of that information, don’t check to see that independent reputable sources converge on the same claims and so forth.
Skills of critical thinking and accessing reputable information will become even more important as more and more people take to online publishing. Sorting through the masses of information available can also be tricky (though is helped by search engines like Google Scholar).
Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 19 Jun 2007
