World of Psychology

Should Bad Docs Be Working on New Drugs?

By John M. Grohol, PsyD
Founder & Editor-in-Chief

You would think that, if you were a business, you’d want to ensure your good reputation and the honor of your company (and your brand) that you only do business with other reputable firms, and people of the highest caliber and quality. You would hire the best and brightest. If you found a bad apple in your group (or amongst your consultants), you’d let them go, in the interests of protecting your name from being tarnished by others who are less reputable than yourself.

Well, you’d think.

Apparently, though, some pharmaceutical companies dredge the bottom of the physician barrel to meet their needs, and we find that truly a shame. The New York Times has the story, and Philip over at Furious Seasons has the commentary.

Because out of the thousands of physicians that work in research with pharmaceutical companies, you’d think it wouldn’t be that difficult to find ethical and honorable replacements for folks who can’t keep themselves out of trouble with a state’s medical board. Keep in mind, too, that most physicians never have any kind of problems with their state’s medical boards — only a small minority ever face their board on charges or allegations.

Minnesota is the shining star amongst the states for bringing a level of transparency into this previously dark and secret world. When you start discovering some of the people involved in the process, it’s kind of like knowing how sausage gets made.

Keep in mind, though, too, that probably more than 99% of the people and professionals involved in getting a new drug to market are ethical, hard-working, dedicated individuals who really want to help others through new pharmaceutical innovations. Why a company would keep this other 1% around that tarnishes their company’s name and reputation is beyond me. It does a real disservice to all of these other people’s hard, ethical work.


Comments


View Comments / Leave a Comment

This post currently has 2 comments. You can read the comments or leave your own thoughts on our new comments page.


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 4 Jun 2007
    Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.

APA Reference
Grohol, J. (2007). Should Bad Docs Be Working on New Drugs?. Psych Central. Retrieved on May 25, 2012, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2007/06/04/should-bad-docs-be-working-on-new-drugs/

 

Recent Comments
  • Joel Hassman, MD: Oh, and by the way, Dr Pies, here is another retort to your demand people use their real names at...
  • CandidFrank65: Interesting article. I have been living in Trinidad since 1965. The fact is that East Indians are much...
  • CARL: I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT YOU HAVE SAID ABOUT INTIMACY (LOVE) NEEDS TRUST AND SAFETY. I TO HAVE STUDIED THIS...
  • Daisy: An article full of wisdom, I think! My husband and I have recently celebrated our 25th wedding...
  • Austin: To the author: “… the rest of the seminal fluid has more than 4 dozen other chemicals. One of...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter



Find a Therapist


Users Online: 3782
Join Us Now!