According to CNN, a new field of study called neurotheology is attempting to understand the neuropsychology behind religion and spirituality. Various theories exist on why people seek religion and faith in their lives, including an idea that our brains are programmed to pursue religion.
The frontal lobe, the area right behind our foreheads, helps us focus our attention in prayer and meditation.
The parietal lobe, located near the backs of our skulls, is the seat of our sensory information. Newberg says it’s involved in that feeling of becoming part of something greater than oneself.
The limbic system, nestled deep in the center, regulates our emotions and is responsible for feelings of awe and joy.
I defintely understand the interest in how the brain processes religion and spirituality, but similar to research on the effectiveness of psychotherapy, I don’t think any methodology can completely quantify or explain the value and meaning in these experiences and beliefs.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Links to This Article
3 Comments to
“A Biological Belief in God?”
Carl Jung wrote a book called the answer to Job, a facinating look at the God Head Concept. In this book he suggests that the actions shown by Yaweh in the old testament show a lack of future sight of his actions. He also suggests that it may be possible that God was created in mans image rather than man in Gods image. This is a facinating book which like alot of Jungs’work is difficult to understand, and my interpretation may be wrong.
It’s just really irresponsible reporting of research to include statements like this:
“The parietal lobe, located near the backs of our skulls, is the seat of our sensory information. Newberg says it’s involved in that feeling of becoming part of something greater than oneself.”
What happens is, a vague sketch of the basic research is reported (sometimes) and then the reporter goes on to get the researcher to speculate on what this all “might mean.” It is the latter that becomes the headline - the speculation. Really a disservice to the science that may have been present in the actual study.
I agree with you there, Greg. Some news stories simplify and distort the original research findings beyond recognition. And sometimes the researchers themselves will speculate wildly in the popular press. I just hope that people will realize that not all neuroimaging studies are bunk; there is some sound science there.
Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 7 Apr 2007








