World of Psychology

Web 2.0 Question & Answer Sites

By John M. Grohol, PsyD
Founder & Editor-in-Chief

Web 2.0 Question & Answer Sites – MetaFilter

I’ve long been a fan of MetaFilter for tapping into a part of the Internet meme, long before the words “social networking” and the gawd-awful meaningless “Web 2.0″ were coined. MetaFilter is “Web 2.0″ long before anyone knew that was cool.

So it’s not surprising that I found this thread to be interesting. When one of the pre-Web 2.0 sites is commenting on yet another more recent spate of Web 2.0 sites, well, you’re bound to get some negativity. But it also tells me something else — that Web 2.0, user-empowered communities are meaningless without some implicit meaning or structure. Flickr — photos. YouTube — videos. Delicious (I never know where to put the damned periods) — Links. Wikipedia — encyclopedia. Myspace — music. Yes, that’s right, it found its original popularity because of sharing music amongst unknown artists. It spilled into the teen peer group precisely for this reason. And then on to the rest of us.

Yahoo! Answers and Wondir — Well, apparently anything goes. And while Yahoo! can sustain such a service (think Yahoo! Groups, Mail, etc.), I question whether other general purpose services can endlessly tap into people’s well-meaning intentions, free time, and willingness to help others indefinitely. Wikipedia may also suffer from this concern, since you have to ask how long will people just continuously care about a project that isn’t their own. The answer is, nobody knows.

Sites focused on a single technology or topic will likely have an easier time with the future than those that try to be all things to all people. Once the atypical becomes common (and, in fact, overwheliming to online users), I think there may be a backlash to so many sites relying on “user generated” content to make money off of, without limits. Remember, the sites aren’t in it to give “users a voice” — they’re in it to make a profit.

I remain undecided about the future of such sites, but am probably still a little bearish on “Web 2.0″ sites without purpose or clear direction. Sure, for every Myspace, there’s a site like Facebook trying to cash in on the same idea to a different audience. But there are also the Friendster’s and Orkut’s of the world — sites virtually left in the dust after initial acclaim.


Comments


View Comments / Leave a Comment

This post currently has 3 comments. You can read the comments or leave your own thoughts on our new comments page.

Trackbacks

No trackbacks yet to this post.


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 15 Aug 2006
    Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.

APA Reference
Grohol, J. (2006). Web 2.0 Question & Answer Sites. Psych Central. Retrieved on February 13, 2012, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2006/08/15/web-20-question-answer-sites/

 

Recent Comments
  • John M. Grohol, PsyD: Hi Dave, 1. I disdain emotional-laden terminology when trying to have a discussion, such as the...
  • Suzy Chapman: Dr Grohol writes: “Kelland fails to note that Europe and the U.K. don’t actually use the DSM to...
  • Dave Hommel: Dr Grohol, I hope you will be forthright and include this follow-up to our first exchange, as...
  • ablo: Perhaps that’s why Netherlands and Finland have the best education in the world.
  • ablo: Me and my friends were called “evil” for reporting someone who got caught cheating. But moreover,...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter



Find a Therapist


Users Online: 2769
Join Us Now!