World of Psychology

More on the NIMH Drug Studies (CATIE)

By Heather Cox
April 12, 2006

April’s issue of The American Journal of Psychiatry also features an editorial by Carol A. Tamminga, M.D., who writes:

That these studies were NIMH-funded increases our confidence that they are as free from marketing or other bias or “spin” as possible. However, we do notice that the results of the CATIE studies, although broader and denser than our previous knowledge, are confirmatory of the efficacy and side effect data that we already know—data derived from pharmaceutical studies. This observation should increase our confidence in the results of drug registration studies, limited as they are to the comparative efficacy of one (possibly two) compounds.

Most of the editorial is about what the two new studies I wrote about a couple weeks ago:

There has not been a previous set of treatment studies that has so clearly shown the tradeoffs for persons who need antipsychotic medication. There is no clear “winner” among the second generation of antipsychotics, weighing effectiveness and efficacy against side effects, nor a clear “loser.” It is only clozapine that is superior, although its side effects are clearly challenging. These data make it abundantly clear that the risks and benefits of any single medication need to be weighed individually with each patient, and that side effect risk needs to be weighed repeatedly during treatment.

and she goes on to say that more research, especially collaborative research, is needed if we’re to better understand the disorder and how to treat it:

The time is right for innovative collaborations between clinicians, basic and translational neuroscientists, and industry to identify research strategies and successful molecular understanding, thereby promoting rational treatments. Moreover, the field must create and sustain teams of people to test innovative treatments, represented most recently by the CATIE consortium.


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 12 Apr 2006

 


Recent Comments
  • Ronald Pies MD: Hi, Katrin–Good to hear from you! Please excuse my obtuseness, but I am not quite sure what...
  • Jennifer Zilliac: Thanks for responding and clarifying Eileen. Given the nature of the request, the post is right on...
  • Katrin: I was thinking about this article today in relation to one of the people who had commented on this article...
  • Katrin: I have not stopped by here either for what seems like ages but today I read many comments and I started with...
  • Eileen Flanagan: Thanks for your comments, Jennifer and Scott. Just to clarify, The Wisdom to Know the Difference is...
Article Tools
Bookmark
Print
Email Friend


Stumble It!


Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Users Online: 1797
Join Us Now!




Follow us on Twitter!

Find us on Facebook!