World of Psychology

A Follow-up to the STAR*D Results

By John M Grohol PsyD
March 26, 2006

I just wanted to write a quick follow-up to the two studies published earlier this week in the New England Journal of Medicine on the STAR*D research initiative.

A lot of the news stories written since these results were published suggest a very positive view of the study. For instance, the Associated Press’s medical writer suggested:

Up to one-third of those who added or changed medicines recovered from the crushing illness that is America’s top mental health problem, researchers said.

This is good news by itself, but the bigger picture is even more encouraging, doctors say. When viewed with earlier results, the new findings mean that roughly half of people who suffer from depression can get over it — not just improve their symptoms — with adequate medication.

But this kind of statement is really clouding the picture of what the current two studies show — that two-thirds of patients who try at least 2 different antidepressant medications over the course of 6+ months still do not find significant clinical improvement in their symtpoms. Six months and little improvement.

Doctors have long known — and have long done — what these studies are showing; using trial-and-error practice, physicians go through a number of antidepressants until they find one that works for an individual. They usually don’t wait 12 or 14 weeks like these studies did, but the studies do show that it is probably beneficial to do so since some people may not feel the effects of the medications until after that time.

Of course, with such a narrow emphasis on medication-only treatment of depression, these results are not surprising. There are a multitude of other studies from the past two decades that show that this is not the best standard of care for depression — medications combined with psychotherapy is. It would be interesting to see the results of a modern, large-scale study that examined such a combination.


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 4.4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Comments to
“A Follow-up to the STAR*D Results”

i covered this exact same story the other day. those large claims and complete ignoring of counseling (even though some folks in the study got cognitive therapy) are turning me into a part-time drug co conspiracy theorist.

As I read the notices, it seems that the free choice issue limits psychotherapy. What I mean is that patients were asked what they would prefer, their preferences were followed, but only a small minority (less than 200) would consent to get involved in cog tx.

This means that psychologists are doing a poor job of marketing psychotherapy as the tx of choice. Drugs get all the press. Well, that’s where the money is. Follow $$$

Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 26 Mar 2006

 


Recent Comments
  • FU.: After you find out how high is up,what’s beyond that?
  • Nepal Expedition: Great list i am agree with this pages
  • GeneB: Dr. Grohol, I’d be interested in finding any information on the “cyber life” of one who is...
  • jose pluma: does size matter?
  • bonnie: I dont know if any of you watch Glee. Well, it is not a deep show, but in the last episode I actually got...
Article Tools
Bookmark
Print
Email Friend


Stumble It!


Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Users Online: 691
Join Us Now!




Follow us on Twitter!

Find us on Facebook!