Mental illness: Surprising, disturbing findings
But research has focused on adults. Much more research on the adolescent brain is needed, and large treatment studies not financed by drug companies must be done, says Thomas Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health, which paid for the survey.
But there’s a shortage of researchers focusing on treating children, “and most are working full time on drug-company-funded studies,” Insel says.
That only a third of adults get effective care “is pretty disturbing,” Insel says. “We’ve got to figure out how to do this better. If I told you only a third of breast-cancer patients were getting adequate care, you’d wonder, how could that be?”
Patients got the most effective care from mental health experts, such as psychologists and psychiatrists, the survey shows. Yet even specialists gave adequate care to just under half of their patients. And 52% saw medical doctors for treatment of mental disorders, with 13% receiving adequate care.
So one take-away from this survey is:
See a mental health professional for an issue, you’re 3 times more likely to receive adequate care than if you just saw your GP or medical doctor.
Stuff like only a third of people who have a mental health issue seek out treatment for it is not news. This is the exact same finding that came out 6 years ago in the Surgeon General’s Report on mental health (see http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter2/).
Really folks, we spend millions researching things like prevalence rates to try and get the message out that if you’re sick, you should seek treatment. We hear you. Now it’s time to divert some of those millions to increasing treatment options and opportunities, re-fund the community mental health center system envisioned by John F. Kennedy in the 1960’s, and help people get the treatment that all of these studies keep showing that people need (but don’t get).
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 8th, 2005 at 12:44 pm and is filed under Policy and Advocacy, Brain and Behavior, Psychotherapy, Disorders. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
One Response to “Mental illness: Surprising, disturbing findings” (Pingbacks/trackbacks not shown below)
Larry Welkowitz at 12:34 am on
June 9th, 2005
Hmmm…the prevalence and incidence data do show some important things: Real people don’t have just one problem (e.g., panic disorder or social phobia or depression), but instead have multiple problems (e.g., panic and social phobia and depression). Treatment studies mislead us in to thinking that there is no co-morbidity (co-occuring conditions). The implications are big, so don’t completely diss epidemiology.
And keep up the good work…love your blog.
Be a Part of the Conversation! Comment on this Entry Now:
Hmmm…the prevalence and incidence data do show some important things: Real people don’t have just one problem (e.g., panic disorder or social phobia or depression), but instead have multiple problems (e.g., panic and social phobia and depression). Treatment studies mislead us in to thinking that there is no co-morbidity (co-occuring conditions). The implications are big, so don’t completely diss epidemiology.
And keep up the good work…love your blog.
