World of Psychology

Wealth does not create individual happiness and it doesn’t build a strong country, either

A study in the recent issue of Psychological Science in the Public Interest addresses how economic status is no longer a sufficient gauge of a nation’s well-being. The authors argue that the psychological well-being of its citizens is the greatest measure of a nation– not the well-being of its economy. “While wealth has trebled over the past 50 years%u2026well-being has been flat, mental illness has increased at an even more rapid rate, and data, not just nostalgic reminiscences, indicate that the social fabric is more frayed than it was in leaner times,” the authors state. Prosperity is neither the answer nor the cause of satisfaction. The study calls for an ongoing systematic set of national indicators of well-being to report on a society and aid in its policy-making.


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Comment to
“Wealth does not create individual happiness and it doesn’t build a strong country, either”

This makes sense to me. I like the philosophy of many European countries, that give lots of holidays and a month of in summer. I believe in the philosophy “work to live” not “live to work.” I especially admire the native culture of Thailand, where a high premium is placed on artistic hobbies — story telling, making elaborate masks and other decorative objects that we see in Thai restaurants here, dance, and religious ritual and community. I believe that Fritjof Capra, in The Turning Point, also discusses how a society that rips workers from their home communities and families of birth, to pursue better jobs elsewhere, uprooting children. Something needs to change, but changing social systems is difficult, because they are complex so a change in one component requires change in many others. Also because an element of unpredictable surprise exists in human behavior, so unintended — and undesirable — outcomes are possible from even the most well-intentioned change.

Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 24 Sep 2004

 


Recent Comments
  • FU.: After you find out how high is up,what’s beyond that?
  • Nepal Expedition: Great list i am agree with this pages
  • GeneB: Dr. Grohol, I’d be interested in finding any information on the “cyber life” of one who is...
  • jose pluma: does size matter?
  • bonnie: I dont know if any of you watch Glee. Well, it is not a deep show, but in the last episode I actually got...
Article Tools
Bookmark
Print
Email Friend


Stumble It!


Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Users Online: 774
Join Us Now!




Follow us on Twitter!

Find us on Facebook!